168 lines
15 KiB
TeX
168 lines
15 KiB
TeX
\relax
|
|
\providecommand\babel@aux[2]{}
|
|
\@nameuse{bbl@beforestart}
|
|
\abx@aux@refcontext{nyt/global//global/global}
|
|
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
|
|
\providecommand\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\AtBeginDocument}
|
|
\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
|
|
\global\let\oldnewlabel\newlabel
|
|
\gdef\newlabel#1#2{\newlabelxx{#1}#2}
|
|
\gdef\newlabelxx#1#2#3#4#5#6{\oldnewlabel{#1}{{#2}{#3}}}
|
|
\AtEndDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
|
|
\let\newlabel\oldnewlabel
|
|
\fi}
|
|
\fi}
|
|
\global\let\hyper@last\relax
|
|
\gdef\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument#1{#1}
|
|
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToFields[1]{}
|
|
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToCoFields[2]{}
|
|
\providecommand \oddpage@label [2]{}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\acswitchoff }
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\acswitchoff }
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\acswitchoff }
|
|
\babel@aux{english}{}
|
|
\@input{sections/introduction.aux}
|
|
\@input{sections/background.aux}
|
|
\@input{sections/policies.aux}
|
|
\@input{sections/literature_study.aux}
|
|
\abx@aux@refcontext{nyt/apasortcite//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@cite{0}{weron_electricity_2014}
|
|
\abx@aux@segm{0}{0}{weron_electricity_2014}
|
|
\abx@aux@refcontext{nyt/apasortcite//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@cite{0}{poggi_electricity_2023}
|
|
\abx@aux@segm{0}{0}{poggi_electricity_2023}
|
|
\abx@aux@refcontext{nyt/apasortcite//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@cite{0}{lu_scenarios_2022}
|
|
\abx@aux@segm{0}{0}{lu_scenarios_2022}
|
|
\abx@aux@refcontext{nyt/apasortcite//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@cite{0}{dumas_deep_2022}
|
|
\abx@aux@segm{0}{0}{dumas_deep_2022}
|
|
\abx@aux@refcontext{nyt/apasortcite//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@cite{0}{rasul_autoregressive_2021}
|
|
\abx@aux@segm{0}{0}{rasul_autoregressive_2021}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{1}{20}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{2}{20}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{3}{20}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{4}{20}
|
|
\abx@aux@refcontext{nyt/apasortcite//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@cite{0}{dumas_deep_2022}
|
|
\abx@aux@segm{0}{0}{dumas_deep_2022}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{5}{21}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Results \& Discussion}{22}{section.6}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Data}{22}{subsection.6.1}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Quantile Regression}{23}{subsection.6.2}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.1}Linear Model}{23}{subsubsection.6.2.1}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Linear model results\relax }}{24}{table.caption.9}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:linear_model_baseline_results}{{3}{24}{Linear model results\relax }{table.caption.9}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Mean and standard deviation of the NRV values over the quarter of the day\relax }}{26}{figure.caption.10}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:nrv_mean_std_over_quarter}{{6}{26}{Mean and standard deviation of the NRV values over the quarter of the day\relax }{figure.caption.10}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Autoregressive linear model results with time features\relax }}{26}{table.caption.11}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:autoregressive_linear_model_quarter_embedding_baseline_results}{{4}{26}{Autoregressive linear model results with time features\relax }{table.caption.11}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model samples.\relax }}{27}{figure.caption.12}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:linear_model_sample_comparison}{{7}{27}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model samples.\relax }{figure.caption.12}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }}{28}{figure.caption.13}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:linear_model_samples_comparison}{{8}{28}{Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }{figure.caption.13}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{29}{figure.caption.14}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:linear_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{9}{29}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.14}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.2}Non-Linear Model}{30}{subsubsection.6.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Non-linear Quantile Regression Model Architecture\relax }}{30}{table.caption.15}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:non_linear_model_architecture}{{5}{30}{Non-linear Quantile Regression Model Architecture\relax }{table.caption.15}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Non-linear quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }}{31}{table.caption.16}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:non_linear_model_results}{{6}{31}{Non-linear quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }{table.caption.16}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear model examples.\relax }}{32}{figure.caption.17}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:non_linear_model_examples}{{10}{32}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear model examples.\relax }{figure.caption.17}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{33}{figure.caption.18}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:non-linear_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{11}{33}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.18}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.3}GRU Model}{33}{subsubsection.6.2.3}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces GRU Model Architecture\relax }}{34}{table.caption.19}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:gru_model_architecture}{{7}{34}{GRU Model Architecture\relax }{table.caption.19}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Autoregressive GRU quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }}{35}{table.caption.20}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:autoregressive_gru_model_results}{{8}{35}{Autoregressive GRU quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }{table.caption.20}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU model examples.\relax }}{36}{figure.caption.21}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:gru_model_sample_comparison}{{12}{36}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU model examples.\relax }{figure.caption.21}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{37}{figure.caption.22}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:gru_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{13}{37}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.22}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}Diffusion}{37}{subsection.6.3}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces Intermediate steps of the diffusion model for example 864 from the test set. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples.\relax }}{39}{figure.caption.23}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:diffusion_intermediates}{{14}{39}{Intermediate steps of the diffusion model for example 864 from the test set. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples.\relax }{figure.caption.23}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Simple diffusion model results.\relax }}{39}{table.caption.24}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:diffusion_results}{{9}{39}{Simple diffusion model results.\relax }{table.caption.24}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces The plots show the generations for the examples from the test set. The diffusion model used to generate the samples consists of 2 layers with a hidden size of 1024. The number of denoising steps is set to 300. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples. All the available input features are used which includes the \acs {NRV}, Load, Wind, \acs {PV} and \acs {NP} data.\relax }}{40}{figure.caption.25}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:diffusion_test_set_examples}{{15}{40}{The plots show the generations for the examples from the test set. The diffusion model used to generate the samples consists of 2 layers with a hidden size of 1024. The number of denoising steps is set to 300. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples. All the available input features are used which includes the \acs {NRV}, Load, Wind, \acs {PV} and \acs {NP} data.\relax }{figure.caption.25}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces The plots show the generations for the first examples from the test set. Two diffusion models with 2 layers and 1024 hidden units are used. The first one is only conditioned on the NRV of the previous day while the second one uses all available input features.\relax }}{41}{figure.caption.26}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:diffusion_test_set_example_only_nrv_vs_all}{{16}{41}{The plots show the generations for the first examples from the test set. Two diffusion models with 2 layers and 1024 hidden units are used. The first one is only conditioned on the NRV of the previous day while the second one uses all available input features.\relax }{figure.caption.26}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.4}Comparison}{41}{subsection.6.4}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{42}{1}{41}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{42}{1}{41}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{CRPS}{42}{1}{41}
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the different models using the \ac {MSE}, \ac {MAE} and \ac {CRPS} metrics. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the \ac {CRPS}.\relax }}{42}{table.caption.27}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:model_comparison}{{10}{42}{Comparison of the different models using the \ac {MSE}, \ac {MAE} and \ac {CRPS} metrics. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the \ac {CRPS}.\relax }{table.caption.27}{}}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NAQR}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{CRPS}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{43}{1}{42}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive linear and GRU model\relax }}{43}{figure.caption.28}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:ar_linear_gru_comparison}{{17}{43}{Comparison of the autoregressive linear and GRU model\relax }{figure.caption.28}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Policies for battery optimization}{44}{section.7}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Baselines}{44}{subsection.7.1}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{46}{1}{45}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{46}{1}{45}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{46}{1}{45}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{46}{1}{45}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{46}{1}{45}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{46}{1}{45}
|
|
\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{46}{1}{45}
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Results of the baseline policies on the test set. \relax }}{45}{table.caption.29}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:fixed_thresholds}{{11}{45}{Results of the baseline policies on the test set. \relax }{table.caption.29}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Policy using generated NRV samples}{45}{subsection.7.2}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the different models using the profit metric. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the profit.\relax }}{46}{table.caption.30}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{tab:policy_comparison}{{12}{46}{Comparison of the different models using the profit metric. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the profit.\relax }{table.caption.30}{}}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{6}{48}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{7}{48}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{8}{48}
|
|
\abx@aux@page{9}{48}
|
|
\@input{sections/appendix.aux}
|
|
\ACRO{total-barriers}{1}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{QR=={0}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{AQR=={0}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{NAQR=={1}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{MSE=={4}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{MAE=={4}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{CRPS=={2}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{NRV=={12}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{PV=={0}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{NP=={0}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{TSO=={2}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{DSO=={0}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{BRP=={1}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{BSP=={1}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{SI=={0}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{FCR=={1}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{aFRR=={1}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{mFRR=={1}}
|
|
\ACRO{usage}{MW=={0}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{BRP=={4@1@3}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{TSO=={3@1@2|5@1@4}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{FCR=={6@1@5}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{BSP=={6@1@5}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{aFRR=={6@1@5}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{mFRR=={6@1@5}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{NAQR=={43@1@42}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{CRPS=={42@1@41|43@1@42}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{MSE=={42@1@41|43@1@42}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{MAE=={42@1@41|43@1@42}}
|
|
\ACRO{pages}{NRV=={3@1@2|45@1@44|46@1@45}}
|
|
\abx@aux@read@bbl@mdfivesum{5DC935CC8C8FAB8A3CAF97A486ED2386}
|
|
\abx@aux@read@bblrerun
|
|
\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{dumas_deep_2022}{nyt/global//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{lu_scenarios_2022}{nyt/global//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{poggi_electricity_2023}{nyt/global//global/global}
|
|
\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{weron_electricity_2014}{nyt/global//global/global}
|
|
\gdef \@abspage@last{51}
|