diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_13344.jpeg b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_13344.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3f076bc
Binary files /dev/null and b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_13344.jpeg differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320.jpeg b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..15e5d2f
Binary files /dev/null and b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320.jpeg differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320_Only_NRV.jpeg b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320_Only_NRV.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ce39bb
Binary files /dev/null and b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320_Only_NRV.jpeg differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_6336.jpeg b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_6336.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7591d90
Binary files /dev/null and b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_6336.jpeg differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_7008.jpeg b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_7008.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..232d95e
Binary files /dev/null and b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_7008.jpeg differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864.jpeg b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..356bc5a
Binary files /dev/null and b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864.jpeg differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864_Only_NRV.jpeg b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864_Only_NRV.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e8a8959
Binary files /dev/null and b/Reports/Thesis/images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864_Only_NRV.jpeg differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/comparison.tex b/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/comparison.tex
index 7844c6e..cce248f 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/comparison.tex
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/comparison.tex
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ After training the different models and experimenting with various hyperparamete
\begin{adjustbox}{width=\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{@{}clcccccc@{}}
\toprule
- Features & Method & Model & \ac{MSE} & \ac{MAE} & \ac{CRPS} & Parameters \\
+ Features & Method & Model & \acs{MSE} & \acs{MAE} & \acs{CRPS} & Parameters \\
\midrule
NRV & & & & & \\
& \acs{AQR} & Linear & 39222.41 & 152.49 & 91.56 & 1,261 \\
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/diffusion.tex b/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/diffusion.tex
index baa5d16..f91ac0c 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/diffusion.tex
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/sections/results/models/diffusion.tex
@@ -83,3 +83,53 @@ In Figure \ref{fig:diffusion_intermediates}, multiple intermediate steps of the
In Table \ref{tab:diffusion_results}, the results of the experiments for the diffusion model can be seen. The diffusion model that was used is a simple implementation of the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM). The model itself exists of multiple linear layers with ReLU activation functions. The diffusion steps were set to 300 for the experiments. This number was determined by doing a few experiments with more and fewer steps. The model performance did not improve when more steps were used. This parameter could be further optimized together with the other parameters to find the best-performing model. This would take a lot of time and is not the goal of this thesis.
The first observation that can be made is the higher error metrics when more input features are used. This is counterintuitive because the model has more information to generate the samples. The reason for this behavior is not immediately clear. One reason could be that the model conditioning is not optimal. Now the input features are passed to every layer of the model together with the time series that needs to be denoised. The model could be improved by using a more advanced conditioning mechanism like classifier guidance and classifier-free guidance.
+\\
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+ \centering
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864.jpeg}
+ \end{subfigure}
+ \hfill
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320.jpeg}
+ \end{subfigure}
+
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_6336.jpeg}
+ \end{subfigure}
+ \hfill
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_7008.jpeg}
+ \end{subfigure}
+ \caption{The plots show the generations for the examples from the test set. The diffusion model used to generate the samples consists of 2 layers with a hidden size of 1024. The number of denoising steps is set to 300. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples. All the available input features are used which includes the \acs{NRV}, Load, Wind, \acs{PV} and \acs{NP} data.}
+ \label{fig:diffusion_test_set_examples}
+\end{figure}
+
+The examples of the test dataset are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diffusion_test_set_examples} using the diffusion model. The first observation that can be made from these plots is the narrow confidence intervals. The real NRV values are not always captured in the confidence intervals. Not enough variance is present in the generated samples. This issue originates from the overfitting during the training of the model. The model is, however, capable of capturing the general trend of the NRV data. In some cases, the peaks in the generated samples are very close to the real NRV values. This can be seen in the first example in the figure.
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+ \centering
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864_Only_NRV.jpeg}
+ \end{subfigure}
+ \hfill
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_864.jpeg}
+ \end{subfigure}
+
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320_Only_NRV.jpeg}
+ \caption{Only NRV}
+ \end{subfigure}
+ \hfill
+ \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\textwidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{images/diffusion/results/samples/Diffusion_Test_Example_4320.jpeg}
+ \caption{NRV + Load + Wind + PV + NP}
+ \end{subfigure}
+
+
+ \caption{The plots show the generations for the first examples from the test set. Two diffusion models with 2 layers and 1024 hidden units are used. The first one is only conditioned on the NRV of the previous day while the second one uses all available input features.}
+ \label{fig:diffusion_test_set_example_only_nrv_vs_all}
+\end{figure}
+
+The plots in Figure \ref{fig:diffusion_test_set_example_only_nrv_vs_all} show the difference in generated samples when only the NRV data is used as input and when all available input features are used. The model that is only conditioned on the NRV data generates samples that do not have much variance. The confidence intervals are quite smooth and do not contain many peaks. The model trained using all available input features, on the other hand, has another behavior. The confidence intervals contain more peaks and the generated samples have more variance. This proves the model does indeed take the other input features into account when generating the samples. When looking at the metrics, the performance of the model that uses all input features is worse than the model that only uses the NRV data. The most obvious reason for this behavior is overfitting.
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 10.synctex.gz b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 10.synctex.gz
index a244560..39b9172 100644
Binary files a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 10.synctex.gz and b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 10.synctex.gz differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 14.synctex.gz b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 14.synctex.gz
index 0f652b3..d3fbabf 100644
Binary files a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 14.synctex.gz and b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 14.synctex.gz differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 2.synctex.gz b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 2.synctex.gz
index f4f8553..39b9172 100644
Binary files a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 2.synctex.gz and b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 2.synctex.gz differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 5.synctex.gz b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 5.synctex.gz
index bcbc46b..39b9172 100644
Binary files a/Reports/Thesis/verslag 5.synctex.gz and b/Reports/Thesis/verslag 5.synctex.gz differ
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux
index 00455c1..b78b75e 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux
@@ -61,4 +61,89 @@
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model samples.\relax }}{26}{figure.caption.12}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:linear_model_sample_comparison}{{7}{26}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model samples.\relax }{figure.caption.12}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }}{27}{figure.caption.13}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:linear_model_samples_comparison}{{8}{27}{Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }{figur
\ No newline at end of file
+\newlabel{fig:linear_model_samples_comparison}{{8}{27}{Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }{figure.caption.13}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{28}{figure.caption.14}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:linear_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{9}{28}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.14}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.2}Non-Linear Model}{29}{subsubsection.6.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
+\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Non-linear Quantile Regression Model Architecture\relax }}{29}{table.caption.15}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{tab:non_linear_model_architecture}{{5}{29}{Non-linear Quantile Regression Model Architecture\relax }{table.caption.15}{}}
+\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Non-linear quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }}{30}{table.caption.16}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{tab:non_linear_model_results}{{6}{30}{Non-linear quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }{table.caption.16}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear model examples.\relax }}{31}{figure.caption.17}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:non_linear_model_examples}{{10}{31}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear model examples.\relax }{figure.caption.17}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{32}{figure.caption.18}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:non-linear_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{11}{32}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.18}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.3}GRU Model}{32}{subsubsection.6.2.3}\protected@file@percent }
+\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces GRU Model Architecture\relax }}{33}{table.caption.19}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{tab:gru_model_architecture}{{7}{33}{GRU Model Architecture\relax }{table.caption.19}{}}
+\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Autoregressive GRU quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }}{34}{table.caption.20}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{tab:autoregressive_gru_model_results}{{8}{34}{Autoregressive GRU quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }{table.caption.20}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU model examples.\relax }}{35}{figure.caption.21}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:gru_model_sample_comparison}{{12}{35}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU model examples.\relax }{figure.caption.21}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{36}{figure.caption.22}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:gru_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{13}{36}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.22}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}Diffusion}{36}{subsection.6.3}\protected@file@percent }
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces Intermediate steps of the diffusion model for example 864 from the test set. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples.\relax }}{38}{figure.caption.23}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:diffusion_intermediates}{{14}{38}{Intermediate steps of the diffusion model for example 864 from the test set. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples.\relax }{figure.caption.23}{}}
+\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Simple diffusion model results.\relax }}{38}{table.caption.24}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{tab:diffusion_results}{{9}{38}{Simple diffusion model results.\relax }{table.caption.24}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces The plots show the generations for the examples from the test set. The diffusion model used to generate the samples consists of 2 layers with a hidden size of 1024. The number of denoising steps is set to 300. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples. All the available input features are used which includes the \acs {NRV}, Load, Wind, \acs {PV} and \acs {NP} data.\relax }}{39}{figure.caption.25}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:diffusion_test_set_examples}{{15}{39}{The plots show the generations for the examples from the test set. The diffusion model used to generate the samples consists of 2 layers with a hidden size of 1024. The number of denoising steps is set to 300. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples. All the available input features are used which includes the \acs {NRV}, Load, Wind, \acs {PV} and \acs {NP} data.\relax }{figure.caption.25}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces The plots show the generations for the first examples from the test set. Two diffusion models with 2 layers and 1024 hidden units are used. The first one is only conditioned on the NRV of the previous day while the second one uses all available input features.\relax }}{40}{figure.caption.26}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:diffusion_test_set_example_only_nrv_vs_all}{{16}{40}{The plots show the generations for the first examples from the test set. Two diffusion models with 2 layers and 1024 hidden units are used. The first one is only conditioned on the NRV of the previous day while the second one uses all available input features.\relax }{figure.caption.26}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.4}Comparison}{40}{subsection.6.4}\protected@file@percent }
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{41}{1}{40}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{41}{1}{40}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{CRPS}{41}{1}{40}
+\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the different models using the \ac {MSE}, \ac {MAE} and \ac {CRPS} metrics. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the \ac {CRPS}.\relax }}{41}{table.caption.27}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{tab:model_comparison}{{10}{41}{Comparison of the different models using the \ac {MSE}, \ac {MAE} and \ac {CRPS} metrics. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the \ac {CRPS}.\relax }{table.caption.27}{}}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NAQR}{42}{1}{41}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{42}{1}{41}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{42}{1}{41}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{CRPS}{42}{1}{41}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{42}{1}{41}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{42}{1}{41}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{42}{1}{41}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{42}{1}{41}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive linear and GRU model\relax }}{42}{figure.caption.28}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:ar_linear_gru_comparison}{{17}{42}{Comparison of the autoregressive linear and GRU model\relax }{figure.caption.28}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Policies for battery optimization}{43}{section.7}\protected@file@percent }
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Baselines}{43}{subsection.7.1}\protected@file@percent }
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
+\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{45}{1}{44}
+\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Results of the baseline policies on the test set. \relax }}{44}{table.caption.29}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{tab:fixed_thresholds}{{11}{44}{Results of the baseline policies on the test set. \relax }{table.caption.29}{}}
+\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Policy using generated NRV samples}{44}{subsection.7.2}\protected@file@percent }
+\ACRO{total-barriers}{1}
+\abx@aux@page{6}{46}
+\abx@aux@page{7}{46}
+\abx@aux@page{8}{46}
+\abx@aux@page{9}{46}
+\ACRO{usage}{QR=={0}}
+\ACRO{usage}{AQR=={0}}
+\ACRO{usage}{NAQR=={1}}
+\ACRO{usage}{MSE=={4}}
+\ACRO{usage}{MAE=={4}}
+\ACRO{usage}{CRPS=={2}}
+\ACRO{usage}{NRV=={9}}
+\ACRO{usage}{PV=={0}}
+\ACRO{usage}{NP=={0}}
+\ACRO{pages}{NAQR=={42@1@41}}
+\ACRO{pages}{CRPS=={41@1@40|42@1@41}}
+\ACRO{pages}{MSE=={41@1@40|42@1@41}}
+\ACRO{pages}{MAE=={41@1@40|42@1@41}}
+\ACRO{pages}{NRV=={44@1@43|45@1@44}}
+\abx@aux@read@bbl@mdfivesum{5DC935CC8C8FAB8A3CAF97A486ED2386}
+\abx@aux@read@bblrerun
+\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{dumas_deep_2022}{nyt/global//global/global}
+\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{lu_scenarios_2022}{nyt/global//global/global}
+\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{poggi_electricity_2023}{nyt/global//global/global}
+\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{weron_electricity_2014}{nyt/global//global/global}
+\gdef \@abspage@last{47}
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf
index f32af90..d5d38dd 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf
@@ -2818,4 +2818,70 @@
article
report
-
\ No newline at end of file
+ author
+ title
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ ./references.bib
+
+
+ weron_electricity_2014
+ poggi_electricity_2023
+ lu_scenarios_2022
+ dumas_deep_2022
+ rasul_autoregressive_2021
+ dumas_deep_2022
+
+
+
+
+ presort
+
+
+ sortkey
+
+
+ sortname
+ author
+ editor
+ translator
+ sorttitle
+ title
+
+
+ sortyear
+ year
+
+
+ sorttitle
+ title
+
+
+ volume
+ 0
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log
index 08304a5..6df73c8 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.25 (TeX Live 2023) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2023.9.17) 11 MAY 2024 02:10
+This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.25 (TeX Live 2023) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2023.9.17) 11 MAY 2024 19:10
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
file:line:error style messages enabled.
@@ -1557,4 +1557,288 @@ Package pdftex.def Info: images/quantile_regression/quantile_performance/AQR_Qua
File: images/quantile_regression/quantile_performance/AQR_Quantile_Performance_Test.jpeg Graphic file (type jpg)